On Wed, 26 Aug 2009, Danny Backx wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 11:35 +0200, Vincent Torri wrote: >> On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, Danny Backx wrote: >>> On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 18:18 +0200, Vincent Torri wrote: >>>> in io.h, shouldn't struct _finddata_t be guarded by _FINDDATA_T_DEFINED >>>> (like _fsize_t is guarded by _FSIZE_T_DEFINED) ? >>>> >>>> Vincent Torri >>> >>> I guess so. Mingw doesn't appear to have this though. Does this bother >>> you or is it a cosmetic question ? >> >> It bother me a bit. It is for the compilation of Lua for Windows CE (Yes >> it is possible !!). Indeed, the guy wrote some code to allow the >> compilation of Lua on that OS, and used _FINDDATA_T_DEFINED around the >> structure. Hence double definition of the structure when compiling. >> >> Even it is not a problem for Lua on win32, I'll report that to the MinGW >> devs. > > I'll fix it. > > I see that you've reported it to MinGW too - very good ! I think that the same stuff is missing for struct timezone in sys/time.h Vicent Torri ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Cegcc-devel mailing list Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
