On Sat, 2008-08-30 at 10:21 +0200, Vincent Torri wrote: > > The most annoying to me is I couldn't get it (4.3.0) to work. > > the c++ stuff ?
Yes. > >> also a discussion about a new newlib would be nice > > > > How has it evolved since the version we currently have ? > > cegcc rely on newlib 1.14.0 if I'm not mistaken. Since then 2 version have > been released (and i think that a new one will be released end of december > i think, like the previous ones) > > the major changes can be found there: > > http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/newlib/NEWS?rev=1.12&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup&cvsroot=src Pedro has added a lot of stuff to our mingw library. After I first joined the project, my impression was that he evolved from supporting both cegcc and ming32ce to focussing on the latter. I must say I gradually moved in that direction too. So I'd ask any newcomer the question : is it really that hard to use mingw32ce instead of cegcc ? > btw, wouldn't it be better to include windows ce code into newlib main > tree, instead of having a kind of fork in the cegcc branch ? Actually this may be the answer to the above. We should be more active in getting our port incorporated in these projects. Pedro did that for gdb. I've started playing with the new gdb release since I got my new PDA but I've not sorted out the problems yet. Danny -- Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Cegcc-devel mailing list Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
