> Great to see that you have succeeded in getting things to work.

Thanks!  I just checked in Makefile changes switching to cegcc, so
if nothing else I'll be testing it for a while. :-)

> > If I'd hit this bug on a desktop gdb would have pointed me right at it,
> > but I had to printf my way to it on PPC.  Just my luck.
> 
> Doesn't our gdb (arm-wince-cegcc-gdb) work for your environment ?

A quick read says I need a network connection to the device, which I
don't have.  I'm moving files by SD card -- which is why I develop and
debug on the linux ports wherever possible, then on win32 using Wine.
I think SD-slot Ethernet adapters are available; I'll look.

> htonl and its friends are available if you link with -lws2.

Thanks.

> The executable I get with the mingw compiler is 113K in size.

Me too now that I know what I'm doing.

> When compiling with the cegcc compiler - the one you've used - the
> default behaviour is indeed to use the big DLL. You can obviously avoid
> that by using the -static switch to the compiler; that increases the
> size of the exe to 259K. (The size of the exe that uses the DLL from the
> cegcc compiler is also 113K - like the one from the mingw compiler.)

I'm happy to ship with the DLL if I can figure out how to make the
open source .cab builder install it automatically.

Thanks for the help -- and the tools.

--Eric
-- 
******************************************************************************
* From the desktop of: Eric House, [EMAIL PROTECTED]                        *
*    Crosswords with Bluetooth on PalmOS now in beta: xwords.sourceforge.net *
******************************************************************************

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Cegcc-devel mailing list
Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel

Reply via email to