> There was some progress made recently towards (1) - big thanks to Chase for taking up ksh93 upgrade. Very nice. You think we should maintain a CDE only version of ksh93 to avoid having to deal with the freebsd example that was provided and to maintain it better so it can work with CDE? Call it something else so it can co-exist with the OS version of ksh93. Just a thought I had.
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 3:44 PM Marcin Cieslak <sa...@saper.info> wrote: > On Fri, 26 Mar 2021, Zeke Williams wrote: > > > Can we remove it and just have the already installed ksh do the work > > instead? > > In addition to what others said - ksh93 should be embeddable, so in theory > one day it should be possible to build dtksh which depends on already > installed > ksh93 libraries. > > Two things need to be done for that: > > 1. dtksh build system needs to be rebuild to allow that (if at all > possible). > 2. operating systems need to start shipping not only ksh binary but also > its shared libraries. > > There was some progress made recently towards (1) - big thanks to Chase > for taking up ksh93 upgrade. > > Marcin
_______________________________________________ cdesktopenv-devel mailing list cdesktopenv-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdesktopenv-devel
