Zeke Williams <lakele...@gmail.com> writes: > I already have ksh installed under /bin in my distro. I had to > download from github ksh93 because the sourceforge git didn't come > with it and the patch as part of compilation failed to apply to be > able to compile it and resulted with an error. Is there anything > mandatory that ksh93 does for CDE? Can we remove it and just have the > already installed ksh do the work instead?
Not to take away from your question (which is a good one), I have a related question which may have an answer similar or related to whatever the answer is to yours: When you compile CDE through the FreeBSD ports system, it pulls in ksh93 as a dependency package. There is a package options switch for the ksh93 package to let you choose whether the port will install as 'ksh' or 'ksh93'. Last time I tried to install CDE this way, the CDE build failed if ksh93 was installed as 'ksh' because it couldn't be found. I really prefer installing as ksh since ksh93 is kind of bizarre as an executable name, and the FreeBSD port gives you a choice to let you avoid that. Will CDE on FreeBSD always require ksh to be named ksh93 at compile time? _______________________________________________ cdesktopenv-devel mailing list cdesktopenv-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdesktopenv-devel
