The new ksh93 maintainer seems amenable to getting it working on every Unix system, so that allays my earlier concerns. I still think it would be nice to get some feedback from someone running NetBSD on whether the new shell is worse or broken compared to the existing one. Perhaps we could maintain a list of folks willing to test different platforms before a formal release?
Also, would it make sense to merge the patches I sent in on the 17th first or rebase them afterwards? I have a Void package prepared for when the musl and PowerPC fixes are in. Kind regards, Lev > On Jan 22, 2021, at 16:41, Chase via cdesktopenv-devel > <cdesktopenv-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > Since Lev fixed the errors in upstream for musl and upstreamed them, lets > pull that in so any potential merge to master also can safely build on musl > (thus the old changes from Lev we would throw away for old ksh would be > replaced with the new changes)l. I also threw in compiler warning fixes for > xmcmds.c. > > Thank you for your time, > -Chase > > > <0001-dtksh-update-ksh-to-commit-47468f-fix-musl-compiler-.patch>_______________________________________________ > cdesktopenv-devel mailing list > cdesktopenv-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdesktopenv-devel _______________________________________________ cdesktopenv-devel mailing list cdesktopenv-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdesktopenv-devel
