> On Jan 18, 2025, at 2:13 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org> > wrote: > > ... > He said, that the computerized version was more adroit at spotting decay > and could perform periodontal charting from radiographs without the > necessity of a hygienist poking at your gums with a probe. > > I'd call that more in the realm of image processing and expert systems > rather than real AI. Expert systems have always been considered a kind of AI system. What makes them somewhat different is that they actually have a decades-long track record of working. I remember learning these back in 1976, from visiting prof. Donald Mickie at the University of Illinois. We used it to build a chess endgame machine. paul
- [cctalk] Re: AI? Really? Frank Leonhardt via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: AI? Really? Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: AI? Really? Antonio Carlini via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: AI? Really? Cameron Kaiser via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: AI? Really? Rick Bensene via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: AI? Real... Joseph S. Barrera III via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: AI? Really? Antonio Carlini via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: AI? Really? Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: AI? Really? Adrian Godwin via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: AI? Real... Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: AI?... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re:... Wayne S via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re:... Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re:... Wayne S via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re:... Wayne S via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re:... Carlos E Murillo-Sanchez via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re:... Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re:... ben via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re:... Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re:... Sellam Abraham via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re:... Chuck Guzis via cctalk