On 14/01/2025 20:59, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
Baudot, of course, was several domain-specific versions. They didn't even all 
have the same letter/figure shift code, never mind the same symbols in the same 
place. You had to just know what the wierdnesses were on any teleprinter that 
wasn't an original Creed (as supplied by Elliott). I've still got a Baudot 
ASR33 in the shed, although I might have scavenged it for parts for the ASCII. 
Mostly common linkage parts on the Baudot - just fewer of them :-)
That would be an ASR32.

I remember seeing a listing of some of the variations of Baudot.  One of them was the 
"weather" version, which had a pile of meteorology symbols in the figures set for use by 
weather station reporting.  There were many versions.  An odd one I remember is the Electrologica 
X8 console, which has printable characters for the 000 code point (# for ltrs and * for figures).  
Not to mention a figures character the users referred to as "iron cross".

For even more strangeness consider the various flavors of six-bit teleprinter codes, which were 
used in the typesetting business.  Services like Associated Press would distribute their news 
stories using those codes.  A special variant came with a pile of different fractions, for sending 
stock listings.  Those codes would give you upper and lower case, but there was still a shift code 
called "upper rail" or "lower rail", a reference to Linotype line-casting 
machines.  Upper rail meant italics, as I recall.

        paul

It could well be been a 32 - I don't think they're labelled. The thing is that I don't think it's much different from the ASCII 33 inside - it just looks like some of the control rods are missing. I don't think the keyboard is any different. But I don't think I've looked at it for 40 years... This isn't what you'd expect from a pre-ASCII model, unless they were planning ahead. Although thinking about it, it was the most modern Baudot machine in the building so perhaps they were designed together.

Not a whole lot of use to me - I kept with a Data Dynamic 390 into the 1980s, which was a 33 in a heavy sound-proof box more suitable for a domestic environment. You couldn't hear it chattering away, but you could feel the rumble throughout the house even though I stood it on foam blocks. Where it remains today.

Reply via email to