> On Sep 16, 2024, at 3:30 AM, P Gebhardt via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org> > wrote: > > >> Hopefully this means that they get the “paper assets”, and are willing to >> scan them. There is stuff that regrettably went to LCM, that should have >> >been scanned. >> >> Zane > > What kind of paper assets are we talking about? *curious* > > Cheers, > Pierre Whatever documentation came with object donated to LCM. And any documents that were donated to LCM separately (as opposed to alongside some object). For example, LCM has a number of PLATO terminals, and I suspect there were documents accompanying them. Some of those may be things that have not been made public elsewhere. paul
- [cctalk] The CMoaA is OK Adam Thornton via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: The CMoaA is OK Lee Courtney via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: The CMoaA is OK Zane Healy via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: The CMoaA is OK P Gebhardt via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: The CMoaA is OK Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: The CMoaA is OK Christian Corti via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: The CMoaA is OK Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] What's the going rate for... Fred Cisin via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: What's the going ... John Robertson via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: What's the g... CAREY SCHUG via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: What's t... Sellam Abraham via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: What's t... Doc Shipley via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: What... Peter Corlett via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: What... Doc Shipley via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: What... ben via cctalk