I am sure you would not follow this person's lead and remove the covers
from the magazines....  For Kennett Classic I scan the covers and have them
printed with UV-durable ink.  I then put into individual black frames.
Over time original some covers may fade, their paper decompose or get light
stained.
Bill

On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 12:08 PM Christian Liendo via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:

> I enjoy and have many of the older magazines. Some I have in plastic
> and some I can actually take out and read because they are not in good
> condition.
>
> When I get my house, I would like to display some of them like this.
>
> https://www.virginiasweetpea.com/window-wall-decor-vintage-magazine-covers/
>
> I have found that normally people collect specific issues that have to
> do with the company/computer that they are collecting and they make a
> great addition to a display.
>
> I personally would like to get my hands on "Hobby Computer" Magazine
> as it's one of the few that I have no issues at all.
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 5:53 PM Brad H via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > Just a 'survey' sort of question - how much value do you guys put in
> vintage
> > copies of old newsletters, magazines, etc.  I'm talking mid-1970s, like
> > People's Computer Company, etc.  Someone has been selling them one at a
> time
> > on ebay and they routinely go for $125+ each!  Was PCC fairly low
> > circulation?  I have no idea how rare these things are - if I should just
> > dive in to have my memento or wait.  Looking at auction history it seems
> to
> > be the same group of 2 or 3 bidders going nuts over them.
> >
> >
> >
> > One newsletter I would love to find an original copy of is Micro-8.. but
> I
> > think the circulation on that was just a hundred or so, so probably
> > unlikely.  It has some blurbs from Grant Runyan in there, who built my
> TVT
> > and Mark-8.
> >
> >
> >
> > But yeah, I just wondered if you guys think generally this stuff
> *should& be
> > considered valuable - given most/all is archived online.
> >
> >
> >
> > Brad
> >
>

Reply via email to