On Wed, Jun 5, 2024, 10:21 AM Will Cooke via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org>
wrote:

>
>
> > On 06/05/2024 8:33 AM CDT Bill Degnan via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 9:03 AM Will Cooke via cctalk <
> cctalk@classiccmp.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > So if a computer was built to be used by a single operator for general
> > purpose use, open to any application development but cost more than the
> > masses could afford, even if it was clear in the manual that the machine
> > was manufactured and intended to be used for general purpose computing,
> > it's not a "personal computer"?
>
> Yes.
> For my own definition.  I have no real interest if anyone agrees or
> disagrees.  As I said, "to my mind" and "my 1/2 cent worth."  I think there
> is a difference between a personal computer and a "Personal Computer."  I
> only offer it in case it is useful to someone else.
>

Fair enough.
B

>

Reply via email to