On Wed, Jun 5, 2024, 10:21 AM Will Cooke via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> > > > On 06/05/2024 8:33 AM CDT Bill Degnan via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org> > wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 9:03 AM Will Cooke via cctalk < > cctalk@classiccmp.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > So if a computer was built to be used by a single operator for general > > purpose use, open to any application development but cost more than the > > masses could afford, even if it was clear in the manual that the machine > > was manufactured and intended to be used for general purpose computing, > > it's not a "personal computer"? > > Yes. > For my own definition. I have no real interest if anyone agrees or > disagrees. As I said, "to my mind" and "my 1/2 cent worth." I think there > is a difference between a personal computer and a "Personal Computer." I > only offer it in case it is useful to someone else. > Fair enough. B >
