On 5/15/24 22:07, Tom Hunter via cctalk wrote: > I thought the CDC CYBER and 6000 series mainframes were great systems which > performed admirably for what they were designed for. I liked COMPASS, SYMPL > and NOS 1 and 2. I didn't do much work in CYBIL, but it was basically an > enhanced version of PASCAL suitable for operating systems work. What is > there not to like? These mainframes and the CDC 7600 outperformed every > other machine until Seymour Cray released his own machines.
SYMPL was pretty new when I left the 6000 series behind. Much of the code, but for some utilities was still assembly. FORTRAN (FTN) was used for some simple things. I worked on Zodiac, which was a multi-CPU COBOL (!) multithreaded multitask OS written for USAF--very unlike anything CDC has ever had.. Lots of ECS and oceans of 844 drives. Special Systems Division was a lot of fun back in the day. Lots of variety before they started cycling down work at SVLOPS. My final years at CDC Sunnyvale were with STAR, only to be resurrected in the 1980s with the ETA machines. I think the ROVER people were among the last people at SVLOPS, but I can't recall precisely. A little factoid is that the 6000 series was very good at running COBOL. --Chuck
