Wow,
I agree that there is clearly an incompatibility - I wonder how? CP/M
should be CP/M... Just the BDOS changed for the individual machine
hardware.
One thought is the screen RAM may be an issue with overlaying.
I suspect that Borland didn't notice, as the TRS80 Model 4 was really late
in the 8 bit world, having been released in 1983. The IBM PC was released
in 1981, so I suspect that by the time somebody ran CP/M on a Model 4,
Borland had moved onto PC/MS-DOS.
Kindest regards,
Doug Jackson
em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878
Follow my amateur radio adventures at vk1zdj.net
On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 at 10:36, Fred Cisin via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org>
wrote:
> >> Does the Turbo Pascal run on those machines with trivial source file?
> >> or subsets of the Kermit code?
>
> On Mon, 8 Apr 2024, Bill Gunshannon via cctalk wrote:
> > Haven't tried any other programs yet as I really wanted Kermit but
> > none of the other CP/M Kermits work on these machines (at least not
> > so far) but the problem does appear to be that the program is just
> > to big.
> >
> > I just can't believe none of he developers noticed or maybe that
> > was the point where they all gave up. :-)
>
> Well, there is still the issue of whether it is an incompatability of that
> version of Turbo Pascal with your machines, . . .
>
>
> Are you running with 128K?
> On machines that support it, 128K does NOT give you a TPA ("Transient
> Program Area") larger than 64K, but it does give it almost 64K.
>
> I wonder how large the TPA is on DOS based CP/M emulators, . . . ?
>
>
> . . . and, of course, is there somewhere, a pre-compiled version of Kermit
> for TRS80 CP/M?
>
> --
> Grumpy Ol' Fred ci...@xenosoft.com
>
>
>
