>Message: 17
>Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 12:52:15 -0500
>From: Bill Gunshannon <bill.gunshan...@hotmail.com>
>Subject: [cctalk] Re: WWVB
>To: cctalk@classiccmp.org
>Message-ID: <sa1pr17mb5737c194f181927517114c55ed...@sa1pr17mb5737.nam
prd17.prod.outlook.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>
>On 1/15/2024 10:47 AM, Chris Elmquist via cctalk wrote:
>> On Sunday (01/14/2024 at 09:55PM -0600), Chris Elmquist via cctalk wrote:
>>> There are a number of WWVB simulator projects out there that will transmit
>>> a weak but usable signal to your clock after getting sync’d from ntp or GPS
>>> NMEA time messages. They were developed to help people develop receivers
>>> :-) One in particular uses an AVR and it should be pretty simple to make
>>> it do the “old protocol”. You’d then hide this behind your clock and it
>>> will sync to it instead of the actual WWVB signal. Solves the protocol
>>> problem and the weak signal problem from real WWVB with one little circuit.
>>>
>>> If Google does not provide, I can dig up some links tomorrow.
>>
>> Hmm. Strange. I did follow-up shortly after the above post with this
>> link,
>>
>> https://www.instructables.com/WWVB-Simulator/
>>
>> but I don't see that that made it to the list.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>
>It did. I got it.
>
>bill
Your original email with the link did not make it into the digest, which is
what I receive.
Chirs, Did you also send it directly to Bill. Perhaps that is what he got.
Bob
