> On Feb 21, 2022, at 10:29 AM, Fritz Mueller <fri...@fritzm.org> wrote: > Also, in taking a look this morning at the M9302 schematic around page 70 in > the commonly available 11/34 engineering drawings set (rev B, Sep 76), there > appears to be a mistake! The output of the SACK turnaround circuit is > annotated here BUS SACK H, but I’m almost certain this should be BUS SACK L… > May be worth a look for other versions of the M9302 drawings to verify this. And indeed -- the rev D, Jul 77 M9302 drawing has this annotation corrected to BUS SACK L.
- Re: Is The M9312 Boot Module Essential? Noel Chiappa via cctalk
- Re: Is The M9312 Boot Module Essential? Noel Chiappa via cctalk
- Re: Is The M9312 Boot Module Essential? Fritz Mueller via cctalk
- Re: Is The M9312 Boot Module Essential? Bill Degnan via cctalk
- Re: Is The M9312 Boot Module Essential? Fritz Mueller via cctalk
- Re: Is The M9312 Boot Module Essenti... Ethan Dicks via cctalk
- Re: Is The M9312 Boot Module Essential? Noel Chiappa via cctalk
- Re: Is The M9312 Boot Module Essential? Noel Chiappa via cctalk
- Re: Is The M9312 Boot Module Essential? Noel Chiappa via cctalk
- Re: Is The M9312 Boot Module Essential? Fritz Mueller via cctalk
- Re: Is The M9312 Boot Module Essential? Fritz Mueller via cctalk
- RE: Is The M9312 Boot Module Essential? pbirkel--- via cctalk
- Re: Is The M9312 Boot Module Essential? Noel Chiappa via cctalk
- Re: Is The M9312 Boot Module Essential? Fritz Mueller via cctalk
- Re: Is The M9312 Boot Module Essential? Mattis Lind via cctalk
- RE: Is The M9312 Boot Module Essential? pbirkel--- via cctalk
- RE: Is The M9312 Boot Module Essential? Noel Chiappa via cctalk
- RE: Is The M9312 Boot Module Essential? Noel Chiappa via cctalk
- Re: Is The M9312 Boot Module Essential? Fritz Mueller via cctalk