On Mon, 31 Jan 2022, Grant Taylor via cctalk wrote:
I think the same type of problem happened with the really old FAT-12 to FAT-16 conversion.Wasn't FAT-12 limited to something near 31 MB?
32 MebiBytes - 1
- Re: Origin of "partition" in storag... Warner Losh via cctalk
- Re: Origin of "partition" in s... Bill Degnan via cctalk
- Re: Origin of "partition" ... Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- Re: Origin of "partition" ... Mike Katz via cctalk
- Re: Origin of "partition" ... Mike Katz via cctalk
- Re: Origin of "partition" in storag... Noel Chiappa via cctalk
- Re: Origin of "partition" in s... Fred Cisin via cctalk
- Re: Origin of "partition" ... Paul Berger via cctalk
- Re: Origin of "partition" ... Peter Corlett via cctalk
- Re: Origin of "partition" in s... Grant Taylor via cctalk
- Re: Origin of "partition" ... Fred Cisin via cctalk
- Re: Origin of "partition&qu... geneb via cctalk
- Re: Origin of "partitio... Fred Cisin via cctalk
- Re: Origin of "par... Maciej W. Rozycki via cctalk
- Re: Origin of "partition" in s... Warner Losh via cctalk
- Re: Origin of "partition" in s... Kenneth Gober via cctalk
- Re: Origin of "partition" in storag... Tom Gardner via cctalk
- Re: Origin of "partition" in s... Huw Davies via cctalk
- Re: Origin of "partition" ... Warner Losh via cctalk
- Re: Origin of "partition&qu... Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- Re: Origin of "partition" in storag... Noel Chiappa via cctalk
