On 1/6/22 10:17, William Donzelli wrote: > If you include prototypes, then you need to include ALL the prototypes > - even things made in single quantities that never worked. > > That is a HUGE amount of stuff that makes EBAM look gigantic.
To be fair, EBAM received a not-insignificant amount of press coverage. What doomed it was the falling cost and increasing density of semiconductor memory. Good idea, wrong time. It was pitched in a few forward-looking responses to government RFPs. But then, so was a lot of other stuff. --Chuck
