> On Jun 23, 2021, at 2:44 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org> > wrote: > > There are the languages that are otherwise nearly impossible to compile. > > Consider SNOBOL4 (although there is a compiled version called SPITBOL, > but without several hard-to-implement features). One can construct > statements at run time and execute them. A bit unusual back then, but > not so much today. That just means compiling it at the time the constructed statement is submitted for execution, then executing the generated code. No problem so long as the compiler is available at run time. PDP-10 TECO did that (it has the same feature, executing a string buffer full of commands). So does Python, and I suspect it solves it the same way. paul
- On compiling. (Was a way off topic subject) Stan Sieler via cctalk
- Re: On compiling. (Was a way off topic subje... Paul Koning via cctalk
- Re: On compiling. (Was a way off topic s... Van Snyder via cctalk
- Re: On compiling. (Was a way off top... Peter Corlett via cctalk
- Re: On compiling. (Was a way off top... dwight via cctalk
- Re: On compiling. (Was a way off topic s... Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- Re: On compiling. (Was a way off top... Paul Koning via cctalk
- Re: On compiling. (Was a way off... Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- Re: On compiling. (Was a wa... Paul Koning via cctalk
- Re: On compiling. (Was ... Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- Re: On compiling. (... Paul Koning via cctalk
- Re: On compiling. (... Van Snyder via cctalk
- Re: On compiling. (... ben via cctalk
- Re: On compiling. (... Paul Koning via cctalk