> On Jun 22, 2021, at 12:40 PM, ben via cctech <cct...@classiccmp.org> wrote: > Lisp is evaluated, not compiled from what little I have read. > If I could read the papers (for free) I could know more. So… have I got this right? 1. You admit directly you have only a little knowledge on the topic. 2. You choose to stand by your uninformed opinion (and dig your heels in deeper, even) instead of accepting information from somebody with more knowledge and/or direct experience, or taking the initiative to learn more about it yourself, before spouting off about it on a public mailing list. Jesus take the wheel. ok bear.
- Re: Early Programming Books Van Snyder via cctalk
- Re: Early Programming Books Daniel Moniz via cctalk
- Re: Early Programming Books Paul Koning via cctalk
- Re: Early Programming Books Rich Alderson via cctalk
- Re: Early Programming Books Daniel Seagraves via cctalk
- Re: Early Programming Books Van Snyder via cctalk
- Re: Early Programming Books ben via cctalk
- Re: Early Programming Books Paul Koning via cctalk
- Re: Early Programming Books Van Snyder via cctalk
- Re: Early Programming Books Jay Jaeger via cctalk
- Re: Early Programming Books r.stricklin via cctalk
- Re: Early Programming Books ben via cctalk
- Re: Early Programming Books Paul Koning via cctalk
- Re: Early Programming Books Van Snyder via cctalk
- Re: Early Programming Books jim stephens via cctalk
- Re: Early Programming Books Mark Linimon via cctalk
- Re: Early Programming Books Lee Courtney via cctalk
- CHM's 1620 (was Re: Early Programming Books) Al Kossow via cctalk
- Re: CHM's 1620 (was Re: Early Programming Book... jim stephens via cctalk
- Re: Early Programming Books Paul Koning via cctalk
- Re: Early Programming Books Lee Courtney via cctalk