I don’t refer to them as Audio-phools. They are GESR’s. (pronounced guesser)
Golden Eared Sonic Reviewers They guess this sounds better than that, so it must be worth it. David > On May 5, 2021, at 6:31 PM, Jay Jaeger via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org> > wrote: > > I think a lot of the time audio-phools, if they will be honest with > themselves, are really trying to recreate the stereo (or even HiFi) sounds of > the 1960s because they have fond memories and like it better. THAT I have no > problem with whatsoever. > > What gets annoying is when the phools try and convince others that this old > gear somehow more accurately reproduces recordings or that the "fleecy" stuff > referred to actually makes things better. Oh well. > > JRJ > > On 5/5/2021 8:14 PM, Jon Elson via cctalk wrote: >> On 05/05/2021 07:44 PM, Donald via cctalk wrote: >>> Many thanks for all the info. I just wanted to make sure my recesses were >>> right. >>> >>> >>> I asked about MG because, in an audio forum, I see folks paying crazy money >>> for AC cords and power line conditioners. I thought a good MG would solve >>> many of the 'problems' they are trying to fix. >>> >>> >> Oh, that's audio-phoolery, the discussion topic of lots of people with a >> real understanding of electronics and physics. The audiophools have NO >> understanding, just "belief". And, they get fleeced regularly by this kind >> of stuff. >> Jon