On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 8:07 PM Tony Aiuto via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > I think that is an artifact of the files being created with the wrong names. > For example, with tape 169249, after you skip the UFDs, tito -t prints > > (SYS) .SHR 1977-01-26 22:22 [1,4] > (SYS) .LOW 1977-01-26 22:23 [1,4] > (SYS) .SHR 1986-08-19 03:53 [1,4] > (SYS) .LOW 1975-10-24 14:52 [1,4] > (SYS) .SAV 1964-01-02 00:01 [1,4] > (SYS) .SAV 1964-01-02 00:01 [1,4] > > All the file names are missing. That seems not right.
Very not right, because this is what tito -t is giving me: (SYS) PIP .SHR 1977-01-26 22:22 [1,4] (SYS) PIP .LOW 1977-01-26 22:23 [1,4] (SYS) LOGINN.SHR 1986-08-19 03:53 [1,4] (SYS) COBOL .LOW 1975-10-24 14:52 [1,4] (SYS) BINCON.SAV 1964-01-02 00:01 [1,4] (SYS) VPDATA.SAV 1964-01-02 00:01 [1,4] Those are the first 6 after the UFDs, and extensions and date/timestamps match yours. I don't have any, at least on 169249, missing the first part of the file name. Jim
