On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 11:04 AM Paul Koning <paulkon...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 7, 2020, at 12:06 PM, Glen Slick via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org> 
> > wrote:
> >
> > ...
> > I was curious about this DEC M8704 DMS11-DA that sold cheap a few days
> > ago. It has eight SMC COM5025 "Multi-Protocol Universal Synchronous
> > Receiver/Transmitter USYNR/T" chips:
> >
> > https://www.ebay.com/itm/373243388363
> >
> > Apparently it can't do anything on its own. It needs to be connected
> > to a UNIBUS through a companion KMC11 processor board, which might not
> > be too common if someone wanted to put together a working
> > configuration.
>
> That model number isn't familiar.
>
> A KMC-11 is simply a microprocessor that sits on the Unibus and does Unibus 
> cycles to another device on behalf of the host.  The idea is to offload 
> operations so the host can ask for block transfers and the KMC does the 
> individual character I/O operations needed.
>
> That said, it clearly is not correct that "it can't do anything on its own".  
> The KMC-11 reaches into the device via its Unibus CSRs.  If you can find a 
> description of its operation, or reverse engineer it, you can clearly write a 
> device driver for it that doesn't rely on a KMC-11.
>
>         paul

Well it does appear that M8704 DMS11-DA "can't do anything on its own"
directly through the UNIBUS. From a quick visual inspection it only
has power and grant continuity traces on the card edge connectors. The
connection to the controlling KMC-11 is through the 40-pin Berg
connector. So without a KMC-11 an alternate interface through the
40-pin Berg connector would be needed.

Reply via email to