> On Sep 17, 2020, at 2:11 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org> > wrote: > > On 9/17/20 8:56 AM, Jon Elson via cctalk wrote: > >> This is not necessarily true. Many systems can handle "VBS" (Variable >> Block Sequential) tape files. >> But, yes, fixed block size is more common. > > "Hybrid" files are quite common, where all blocks are the same size, but > for the last one. Or, in the case of some PDP 11 tapes, there's a short > record containing file name, etc. followed by the file data in > uniformly-sized blocks, but for the last one in the file. Even there you might find some oddities. A RSTS distribution tape, for recent releases, begins with some DOS-11 formatted data, i.e., 14 byte file header and 512 byte data. That is followed by ANSI labelled data, so 80 byte file labels and data in a VMS-style backupset, 2048 byte blocks I think. paul
- Re: 9 track tapes and block sizes Lars Brinkhoff via cctalk
- Re: 9 track tapes and block sizes Matt Burke via cctalk
- Re: 9 track tapes and block sizes Jeff Woolsey via cctalk
- Re: 9 track tapes and block sizes Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- Re: 9 track tapes and block sizes Holm Tiffe via cctalk
- Re: 9 track tapes and block sizes Paul Koning via cctalk
- Re: 9 track tapes and block sizes Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- Re: 9 track tapes and block sizes Jeff Woolsey via cctalk
- Re: 9 track tapes and block sizes Jon Elson via cctalk
- Re: 9 track tapes and block sizes Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- Re: 9 track tapes and block sizes Paul Koning via cctalk
- Re: 9 track tapes and block sizes shadoooo via cctalk
- Re: 9 track tapes and block sizes Patrick Finnegan via cctalk
- Re: 9 track tapes and block sizes Al Kossow via cctalk
- Re: 9 track tapes and block sizes Lars Brinkhoff via cctalk
- Re: 9 track tapes and block s... Al Kossow via cctalk
- Re: 9 track tapes and bl... Al Kossow via cctalk
- Re: 9 track tapes and bl... Lars Brinkhoff via cctalk