If it helps at all,  I run a public hp2000/access emulated system that everyone 
is free to play with.  It’s been up for many years.

Telnet to Mickey.publicvm.com
Do ctl m and ctl j till you see PLEASE LOG IN
HEL-t001,hp2000,1

If anyone wants a personal account just let me know.

-Bob 


-Bob

> On Apr 9, 2020, at 11:18 PM, David Williams via cctalk 
> <cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> 
> On 2020-04-08 22:47, J. David Bryan via cctalk wrote:
>> The HP Orsay (not Grenoble, as I misremembered) implementation is the only
>> SNOBOL3 implementation I've used.  There's a free SNOBOL4 implementation
>> here for various PC operating systems:
>>  https://github.com/spitbol/
>> Actually, it's a SPITBOL implementation, which is a compiled version of
>> SNOBOL4; see:
>>  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SPITBOL
>> I've used the Windows NT version for years; it's still my preferred
>> language for string manipulation.  Note that SNOBOL3 and SNOBOL4 are
>> different syntactically, though learning one certainly would aid in
>> learning the other.
> 
> I first learn of SNOBOL4, still have my copy of the green book which was how 
> I first came across it. I know there are various versions available online 
> these days, just been low on the todo list.
> 
>> If you're not necessarily wedded to the HP 21xx/1000 architecture, the HP
>> 3000 simulator and its associated MPE operating system kit from the SIMH/HP
>> site has a number of languages preinstalled:
>>  - BASIC (interpreter and compiler)
>>  - COBOL 68
>>  - COBOL 74/85
>>  - FORTRAN 66
>>  - Pascal
>>  - RPG
>>  - SPL
>> The latter is HP's proprietary Systems Programming Language, an ALGOL-like
>> derivative used in lieu of assembler to implement MPE and most of the
>> compilers and utilities.
> 
> Only "wedded" to the HP 21xx for nostalgia purposes having been my first 
> exposure to computers and wanted to play with it some more. Having lots of 
> free time at the moment, I'm investigating lots of different systems. Mainly 
> via emulation/simulation. HP 3000 is certainly on the list and a lot of the 
> languages that you list there are on the "to play with" list so I'll probably 
> bump it up the todo list a bit. Would be fun to play around with COBOL, 
> FORTRAN and others again. I seem to recall we had a FORTRAN on our 2000F 
> which was my first exposure to that language but as it was under 2000F TSB I 
> assume it was something written in BASIC that either interpreted FORTRAN or 
> maybe a p-code like system or what I have no idea. Was so long ago I have old 
> print outs from it but don't recall anything more about it otherwise and 
> haven't ever seen anything about it in my limited searches. But it did start 
> me exploring other languages which lead me to discover SNOBOL and many others.
> 
> David Williams

Reply via email to