On 11/18/19 11:24 AM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
not really, all it meant was there was some intelligence at the terminal
it wasn't capable of any sort of user-programmable computation
Okay.
Sounds like distributed is just a term collision then. Thank you for
the clarification.
that changed pretty quickly with the wide adoption of the IBM PC
I came across a document recently that showed
what a mess IBM had on their hands in 1984
http://bitsavers.org/pdf/ibm/sna/GC30-3085-3_Distributed_Office_Support_System_General_Information_Oct1984.pdf
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
