On Sun, Jul 21, 2019, 12:35 PM Jason T via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 11:41 AM Warner Losh via cctalk > <cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > > 600dpi. The file is 22MB vs 12MB, so that's worth it. The 1200dpi version > > was almost 70MB which is starting to get a bit large for a 60 sheet > > document. The sweet spot seems to be 600dpu, at least for this material. > > I don't know about the ScanSnap specifically, but I suspect that > 1200dpi mode may be interpolated, not true optical 1200. In either > case, I've rarely seen any great benefit to using >600, at least on > any scanner I've used (my main workhorse now being a Fujitsu > fi-5750C). > ScanSnap is true 1200dpi. At least for black and white. Takes 4x longer to feed through, so it's not some software thing... Warner >
