On 6/4/19 8:30 PM, allison via cctalk wrote:
Keep in mins the hardware for auto dial required some for of micro and that was a post 1974 thing for the most part.

Why did it require a micro? Could the host not perform the function that the micro would do?

A few before that had a lot of TTL state machine to do that. They obviously weren't cheap.

Why did that state machine need to be implemented in electronics?

Why couldn't that state machine be implemented in software on the host using the modem & auto-dialer?

The dialer was often not at all as it was the human that dialed the phone.

~chuckle~

I know of none that did both functions that required a second serial port.

Okay.

Reading the links that Ethan provided, it sounds like some auto-dialers did use a second port, but it was not a second (recommended) standard 232 port. Instead it was an RS-232 and RS-366.

Aside: RS-366 sounds odd. A combination of serial signaling and parallel signaling on the same port. But not the same as a traditional parallel printer port.

My first modem was a box about 12x8x2.5 inches and it was an all analog modem good for 110/300 baud and it required connection to the phone line (pre-modular connector) and you dialed the various (and relatively scarce) BBSs and when you heard the tone hit the switch that put the modem on the phone line and you would see the carrier and data lamps do their thing. That was 1978ish.

Aside: I assume that you're talking about before the small 6-position 2 or 4 conductor plugs. Or are you referring to the older than that not-quite-square 4 pin plug? Or was the modem actually hard wired in with no plug / jack at all?

A modem that could dial was maybe 1983-5 or so at affordable prices (under 300$) for 300 baud.

*nod*

I have this mental picture, which I think is based on something I've seen at some point in the past, that was a device that attached / actuated / ??? a traditional rotary dial phone. As in it had a finger that interfaced with the dial and something that could rotate it to dial the digit in question, rewind (term?), and dial the next digit in question.



--
Grant. . . .
unix || die

Reply via email to