> On Mar 29, 2019, at 11:18 AM, Jon Elson via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org> > wrote: > > ... > Oh, one other issue is the 360's had no FFs. All storage elements were > transparent latches, and they generally used a 4-phase clock. The same is true for the CDC 6600. Not a big surprise; a transparent latch can be made of two cross-connected gates, while a flip-flop (edge triggered) requires more stuff (four gates?). And the 6600 uses at least four clock phases; in parts of the CPU there are additional clocks so some of the hairy parts are more like 6 or so phases. paul
- IBM 360 Model 50 information? Ken Shirriff via cctalk
- Re: IBM 360 Model 50 information? Jon Elson via cctalk
- Re: IBM 360 Model 50 information? Paul Koning via cctalk
- Re: IBM 360 Model 50 information? dwight via cctalk
- Re: IBM 360 Model 50 information? Curious Marc via cctalk
- Re: IBM 360 Model 50 information? Al Kossow via cctalk
- Model 40 Re: IBM 360 Model 50 inf... Steve Malikoff via cctalk
- Re: Model 40 Re: IBM 360 Model ... Bill Degnan via cctalk
- Re: Model 40 Re: IBM 360 M... Paul Berger via cctalk
- Re: Model 40 Re: IBM 3... Bill Degnan via cctalk
- Re: Model 40 Re: I... Al Kossow via cctalk
- Re: Model 40 Re: I... Jon Elson via cctalk
- Re: Model 40 Re: I... Jon Elson via cctalk