On 11/23/18 5:52 AM, Peter Corlett via cctalk wrote:
Worse than that, it's *American* ignorance and cultural snobbery which
also affects various English-speaking countries.
Please do not ascribe such ignorance with such a broad brush, at least
not without qualifiers that account for people that do try to respect
other people's cultures.
The pound sign is not in US-ASCII, and the euro sign is not in ISO-8859-1,
for example.
Well, seeing as how ASCII, the /American/ Standard Code for Information
Interchange, is inherently /American/, I don't personally fault it for
not having currency symbols for other languages / regions.
Instead, I consider ASCII to be a limited standard. Hence why so much
effort has gone into other standards to overcome this, and other,
limitation(s).
I do not know for sure, but I'm confident that other character sets
don't have characters / glyphs from other languages.
I'm sure that there is room for a discussion of why ASCII is used as the
underlying character set for network services and the imposition that it
imposes on international friends and colleagues.
Amusingly, peering through my inbox in which I have mail in both Dutch
and English, the only one with a UTF-8 subject line is in English. It
was probably composed on a Windows box which "helpfully" turned a hyphen
into an en-dash.
I'm trying to NOT search my mailbox.
I'd be more curious about the number of bodies that contain UTF-8 or
UTF-16 that can encode more characters / glyphs. It's my understanding
that without some special quite modern extensions, non-ASCII is shunned
in headers, including the Subject: header.
P.S. Resending from the correct email address. — A recent Thunderbird
update broke the Correct-Identity add-on. :-(
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
