> On Aug 31, 2018, at 3:07 PM, systems_glitch <systems.gli...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yeah, I forget what the original allowed length was for drop cables, but I > seem to remember it striking me as quite long! A few feet of CAT5 (or even > better, STP) has a lot of wiggle room :P 50 meters, says IEEE 802.3. paul
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 Test Segm... systems_glitch via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 Test Segment:... Bill Gunshannon via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 Test Segment: The Cable is... Grant Taylor via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 Test Segment: The Cab... systems_glitch via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 Test Segment: The... Grant Taylor via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 Test Segment:... systems_glitch via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 Test Segm... Paul Koning via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 Test... systems_glitch via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 ... Paul Koning via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 ... systems_glitch via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 ... Paul Koning via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 ... Grant Taylor via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 ... Paul Koning via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 ... systems_glitch via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 ... Ethan via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 ... Paul Koning via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 ... Cameron Kaiser via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 ... systems_glitch via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 ... Mike Stein via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 ... Cameron Kaiser via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 ... systems_glitch via cctalk