On Jul 18, 2018, at 10:21 AM, Paul Berger via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > I would think that any interpreted BASIC would do this or for that matter any > interpreted language except maybe for APL You'd think so but many BASIC dialects don't fully tokenize. Many leave in all the extra spaces the user types in, such as the Microsoft BASIC on various Commodores. Some BASICs even require the spaces in order to properly parse during tokenization. There's a page here which includes a field for machines which do full tokenization: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_computers_with_on-board_BASIC -- Follow me on twitter: @FozzTexx Check out my blog: http://insentricity.com
- Re: Reading HP2000 tapes Ed Sharpe via cctalk
- BASIC (Was: Reading HP2000 tapes Fred Cisin via cctalk
- Re: BASIC (Was: Reading HP2000 tapes Fred Cisin via cctalk
- Re: BASIC (Was: Reading HP2000 ta... Toby Thain via cctalk
- Re: BASIC (Was: Reading HP2000 tapes John Foust via cctalk
- Re: BASIC (Was: Reading HP2000 ta... Guy Sotomayor Jr via cctalk
- Re: BASIC (Was: Reading HP200... Brent Hilpert via cctalk
- Re: BASIC (Was: Reading ... Curious Marc via cctalk
- Re: BASIC (Was: Read... Paul Berger via cctalk
- Re: BASIC (Was: Read... Paul Koning via cctalk
- Re: BASIC (Was: Read... Chris Osborn via cctalk
- Re: Reading HP2000 tapes Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- RE: Reading HP2000 tapes Rick Bensene via cctalk
- Re: Reading HP2000 tapes Al Kossow via cctalk
- Re: Reading HP2000 tapes Jon Elson via cctalk