> On Jun 26, 2018, at 3:23 PM, Ethan Dicks via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org> > wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 3:07 PM, systems_glitch via cctalk > <cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: >> ... > >> I seem to recall the CCNA instructor telling us that you weren't really >> supposed to screw a 50 ohm terminator onto an intrusive tap; I don't know >> if there's good reason for it or if it was just a general practice. > > I think the reason is you won't have enough distance between the tap > and the endpoint of the transmission line. Maybe that was the thinking, but if so that is simply wrong. Ethernets are terminated at both ends (as is any transmission line), independent of the cable length, and the presence of taps is entirely irrelevant to this. paul
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 Test Segment: The... Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 Test Segment:... Paul Koning via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 Test Segm... systems_glitch via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 Test Segment:... Bill Gunshannon via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 Test Segment: The Cable is... Noel Chiappa via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 Test Segment: The Cab... systems_glitch via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 Test Segment: The... systems_glitch via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 Test Segment:... Paul Koning via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 Test Segm... systems_glitch via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 Test Segment:... Ethan Dicks via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 Test Segm... Paul Koning via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 Test Segment:... Grant Taylor via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 Test Segm... Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 Test... Eric Smith via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 ... Paul Koning via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 ... systems_glitch via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 ... Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 ... Antonio Carlini via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 ... Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 ... Peter Coghlan via cctalk
- Re: Thicknet/10base5 ... systems_glitch via cctalk