On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 5:54 PM, j...@cimmeri.com <j...@cimmeri.com> wrote:
> > > On 12/17/2016 1:23 PM, Stephen Pereira wrote: > >> I was (finally) lucky enough to acquire an Altair 680 back in November... >> > > Is there any logic to the naming of these Altairs? Wonder why it wasn't > "Altair 8080" and "Altair 6800". 8800 and 680 don't follow the same > pattern. > > ------ > > Had MITS made other Altairs... > > Altair 8800 = 8080 > 8850 = 8085 > 8860 = 8086 > 8880 = 8088 > 8286 = 80286 > 8386 = 80386 > 680 = 6800 > 680 = 6809 > 680 = 68000 > > ;-), > > - JS > ---------------------------- > lol, I would love to hear that too if anyone knows any stories behind the naming. Used to hurt my head to remember that it was an 8800 not an 8080. I know the fairly well published story about the name Altair but companies and their model numbers are always odd.
