oh, and FWIW the 'monitor' you need is a Twinax terminal. They are a bit more comomon than coax ones and seem to be less desirable.
On 11/5/16 12:07 PM, Al Kossow wrote: > > > On 11/5/16 11:24 AM, Jason T wrote: >> I'm guessing >> it's far more due to IBM having never released anything close to >> technical documentation on the architecture > > S/32 - 36 are fairly well documented. It's just non-trivial to do the work > and would require someone to reverse-engineer with a machine next to them. > > S34 would probably be easier though since it only has one processor and > didn't have quite as much LSI in it. > > If you need some place to dump the resulting scans and disk images, I can > put them on bitsavers. I still have several boxes of S/36 documentation in > the backlog. > >
