On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 4:11 AM, Noel Chiappa <j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> wrote:
> > From: Lars Brinkhoff > > > Emacs in 1983 would have been Gosling Emacs, I guess. > > Prior to that one, someone else at BBN (whose name I have forgotten, alas) > did an Emacs intended for PDP-11's running Unix. It wasn't programmable > (the > way 'real' Emacs is), perhaps because there was not enough room for that > on a > PDP-11. > > I should have that on my MIT-CSR backup tapes, but if you're interested in > a > copy, it will be a while before I can excavate it; the tapes had some > dropouts, which may have made the dump (a straight 'dd' of a 4.3 > filesystem) > unreadable. > > Noel > I would love to have an Emacs I could run on my Pro-380. Then I can do some real work with it. -- Ian S. King, MSIS, MSCS, Ph.D. Candidate The Information School <http://ischool.uw.edu> Dissertation: "Why the Conversation Mattered: Constructing a Sociotechnical Narrative Through a Design Lens Archivist, Voices From the Rwanda Tribunal <http://tribunalvoices.org> Value Sensitive Design Research Lab <http://vsdesign.org> University of Washington There is an old Vulcan saying: "Only Nixon could go to China."
