> Win95 for those running NT 3.51 was something of a low point. Compared > to the latter, 95 was a cranky, bug-ridden system that was burdened by > 8.3 file names, limited disk size, etc. I remember BSOD after BSOD when > my NT system ran just fine. By the next year, when NT 4.0 came out, > there was no comparison. > > And 3.51 would run on PPC, MIPS and Alpha platforms.
So did 4.0. Early betas of 2000 still ran on Alpha and some others, IIRC, though I believe the PowerPC port was dropped around then. -- ------------------------------------ personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ -- Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckai...@floodgap.com -- Chaos reigns within/Reflect, repent and reboot;/Order shall return. --------
