> -----Original Message----- > From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Camiel > Vanderhoeven > Sent: 12 July 2016 14:06 > To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts > <cctalk@classiccmp.org> > Subject: Re: IBM 360/30 in verilog > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Dave Wade <dave.g4...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of > >> Camiel Vanderhoeven > >> Sent: 12 July 2016 09:56 > >> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts > >> <cctalk@classiccmp.org> > >> Subject: RE: IBM 360/30 in verilog > >> > >> Op 12 jul. 2016 10:14 a.m. schreef "Dave Wade" > <dave.g4...@gmail.com>: > >> > > >> > > -----Original Message----- > >> > > From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of > >> > > Curious Marc > >> > > Sent: 12 July 2016 08:58 > >> > > To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts > >> > > <cctalk@classiccmp.org> > >> > > Subject: Re: IBM 360/30 in verilog > >> > > > >> > > Darn. My hopes are shattered. Lots of Verilog in my future, that > >> > > is if > >> we > >> > can > >> > > find 360/50 ALDs... > >> > > Marc > >> > > > >> > > >> > It actually might be easier to produce a generic S/360 clone in > >> > FPGA using the POP rather than individual ALU's. > >> > Having built a very simple CPU (in VHDL not Verilog) and planning > >> > to start on a more complex (Ferranti Pegasus) Of course it wouldn't > >> > be cycle accurate, but perhaps that wouldn't be important. > >> > >> Sure, a generic one would be simpler, but the point of doing an > >> accurate one of a specific model (65 in my case) is to accurately > >> drive the panel that shows the internal registers and opening of gates. > > > > I think you are correct. I had assumed that the panel only displayed > > the normal 360 registers, in which case the VHDL could easily route > > these to a panel, but on reading the 360/65 Functional Characteristics > > > > http://bitsavers.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de/pdf/ibm/360/funcChar/A22- > > 6884-3_360-65_funcChar.pdf > > > > I can see several registers are displayed that are not mentioned or > > defined elsewhere so you would need a Set of ALDs for the 65 (or > > possibly a 67 as that’s basically the same machine) to get a full panel > display. It would Also be nice to see what is on the roller selector switchs > as > that page in the manual has not scanned very well.. > > I have a pdf file I created that shows the layout of the roller bars; I don't > think the link can take attachments, but if you want I could email you a copy > directly. > > Camiel.
A direct reply would be very nice. Dave
