On 2015-Dec-12, at 4:15 PM, Eric Christopherson wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2015, Robert Rissell wrote:
>> The batch job consisted of a Batch Number for accounting, the keyword-coded
>> header card(s) to tell the computer what to do with the following cards
>> such as Compile, Link, Execute then Output for a Fortran source.
> [snip]
>> Following the source you would find the cards
>> listing the input for the program, such as a list of accounts and amounts
>> to be added
>> together or sorted.
> 
> So you could have the same batch job compile AND run the program? That
> kind of surprises me. Must have saved a lot of time that way.

I entered university on the tail end of the batch era, and for student 
coursework that was the way it worked: job control cards, source, data.
Compile, list, execute, program-output all in one submission.

(This was under MTS, which despite being a timesharing system (Michigan 
Terminal System), still had support for batch.)

The good thing about batch is there was always the incentive to get your entire 
program right the first time.

Reply via email to