>> So far, I haven't found anything that says that the code for the >> FPGA is open source / documented. (I assume there's a "not" missing after the "is")
> I think mouse was referring to the toolchain, structure of and > interface to the FPGA itself, etc. I.e. an open FPGA product. Yes. I consider it important for the custom CPU's definition to be open. But that's not what I was really interested in; I haven't used Oberon and don't really expect to start. What I was really interested in was whether the FPGA itself was open. If so, I definitely would have wanted to pick up the hardware, because I would love to experiment with an FPGA - but I am _not_ going to put up with running a vendor binary blob (which probably won't even run on my machines) to get an undocumented blob to throw at the hardware. /~\ The ASCII Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML mo...@rodents-montreal.org / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
