> On Nov 23, 2015, at 7:45 PM, David Bridgham <d...@froghouse.org> wrote:
> 
> On 11/23/2015 07:05 PM, Paul Koning wrote:
> ...
>> Sure, you can throw in a microcontroller, but interfacing that is likely to 
>> take far more gates than doing the mapping in the device directly.
> 
> The original reason for the microcontroller is to implement the USB
> protocol.  I didn't feel up to that in Verilog.

I can understand that, but surely that's an off the shelf item?

        paul

Reply via email to