> On Nov 23, 2015, at 7:45 PM, David Bridgham <d...@froghouse.org> wrote: > > On 11/23/2015 07:05 PM, Paul Koning wrote: > ... >> Sure, you can throw in a microcontroller, but interfacing that is likely to >> take far more gates than doing the mapping in the device directly. > > The original reason for the microcontroller is to implement the USB > protocol. I didn't feel up to that in Verilog.
I can understand that, but surely that's an off the shelf item?
paul
