>> Sorry for the scope creep; but perhaps it might be more >> useful/interesting to make it a registry of any VAX that has a name of >> the form "VAX-11/7xx"? (Which could also include the VAX 8600 and > VAX >> 8650, since were originally to be called the VAX-11/790 and >> VAX-11/795.) > > I'd vote for "big VAX" list. The minutiae of marketing names is > pretty > boring and irrelevant to such a list isn't it? > > --Toby I wonder how the ratio of VAX 6000s and 7000s in enthusiasts' hands compared of VAX 11's in terms of numbers is? I guess that /780 and larger systems are rare, but I'd guess that there are some more /730 and /750 around. No idea if my gut feeling reflects facts, though. Kind regards, Pierre
- Re: Reviving a VAX-11/750 Mark J. Blair
- RE: Reviving a VAX-11/750 tony duell
- Re: Reviving a VAX-11/750 Mark J. Blair
- Re: Reviving a VAX-11/750 Mattis Lind
- Re: Reviving a VAX-11/750 Mattis Lind
- Re: Reviving a VAX-11/750 Toby Thain
- Re: Reviving a VAX-11/750 Mark J. Blair
- VAX-11/750 registry (Was: Reviving a VA... Alan Perry
- Re: VAX-11/750 registry (Was: Reviving ... Christian Gauger-Cosgrove
- Re: VAX-11/750 registry (Was: Reviving ... Toby Thain
- Re: VAX-11/750 registry (Was: Reviving ... P Gebhardt
- Re: VAX-11/750 registry (Was: Reviving ... Fred Cisin
- RE: VAX-11/750 registry (Was: Reviving ... Jay West
- RE: VAX-11/750 registry (Was: Reviving ... Robert Armstrong
- RE: VAX-11/750 registry (Was: Reviving ... tony duell
- Re: VAX-11/750 registry (Was: Reviving ... Alan Perry
- Re: VAX-11/750 registry (Was: Reviving ... Johnny Billquist
- RE: VAX-11/750 registry (Was: Reviving ... tony duell
- Re: VAX-11/750 registry (Was: Reviving ... Johnny Billquist
- Re: VAX-11/750 registry (Was: Reviving ... Antonio Carlini
- Re: VAX-11/750 registry (Was: Reviving ... Johnny Billquist