i own a 16500B software is still on HPs site i got it off ebay for 200$ fully loaded with a FULL set of probes i am very happy with it
go for the hp On 5/29/2015 1:37 PM, Marc Verdiell wrote: > I'd suggest to go for the king of the hill at the time, and get an HP 16xx > (163x, 165x, 166x, 167x) for all-in-ones or the 16500 if you like to > modularize yourself, although tis latter one is much harder to put together > since you have to get the frame, the plug ins, the software, etc... > On the 16yx, the higher the y number, the better the machine (i.e faster, > better screens, more memory). They are widely available, starting at below > $100 for the earlier machines, and up to $300-$400 for the later ones. I'd > recommend to have at least one that has a hard disk, so you don't have to > find or make an old LIF floppy to boot from. > As always the rub is the pods/probes. I had to complete my set separately, > but they are also widely available. > This is a relatively small amount to pay for what these machines actually > are. The later ones have the inverse assembler for the 68000. > I got the luxury one, a 1670G with the pattern generator (which I haven't > found an excuse to use yet). Here it is at work: > http://youtu.be/X_6limxLZ_k > > > Sent from my iPad > >> On May 29, 2015, at 12:00 PM, cctalk-requ...@classiccmp.org wrote: >> >> Message: 20 >> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 22:53:07 -0400 >> From: Ken Seefried <seefr...@gmail.com> >> To: cctalk@classiccmp.org >> Subject: OT: Looking for the Tek 465 of Logic Analysers >> Message-ID: >> <caorcwjx8hkjddgclyvzsbrotk8qmgbsf2kvnzbmsjpqrzzf...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 >> >> Maybe only semi-OT. I'm working on a couple of classiccmp-ish projects >> (6303, 6309 and 68030) and I find the trusty old Tek 465 o-scope is no >> longer compensating for my lack of design skill (or I'm getting better at >> hiding bugs in my designs, depending how you look at it). I'm looking for >> a recommendation for a logic analyzer. Considering my very modest design >> constraints, I'm thinking: >> >> - Suitable for 50MHz designs (really more like <16MHz, but you never know) >> - 32 channels would be nice, ~128 probably perfect, less...you know...do >> what you gotta do... >> - No weird technologies in the design (all TTL/CMOS logic) >> - I'm willing to spend a few $$ to get decent kit, but need to spend closer >> to 465 money than TLA7012 money >> - Decent analytics, hopefully more than "here's your traces...good luck" >> - Ease of finding complete kit; nothing worse than dropping a dime on what >> looks like a good deal only to find you're missing the unobtanium cable, or >> the software disk that the vendor will be more than happy to provide you >> only under a cripplingly expensive support contract. -- The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the named addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized use, copying, disclosure, or distribution of the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited by the sender and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail.
