Thank you for your suggestions.
As this is a high resolution structure (1.1Å) I have been refining it with
anisotropic B-factors.
Placing a propionate or modelling a phosphate at this position blows up
during the refinement.
I will inform you if I am successful in figuring this out.
Best
Misbha


On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 7:01 PM SHEPARD William <
william.shep...@synchrotron-soleil.fr> wrote:

> Dear Misba,
>
> Perhaps it's a silly question, but have you tried to model in propionate?
> The carboxylate group could make H-bonds to both the Arginine sidechain and
> the the tyrosine OH group. Propionate should show no anomalous signal.
>
> Just my 2-bits worth.
>
> Cheers,
> Bill
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gerard Bricogne" <g...@globalphasing.com>
> To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Sent: Saturday, 29 January, 2022 18:34:26
> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Help with interpreting Tyrosine modification
>
> Dear Misba,
>
>      Thank you for your reply and for the very clear picture. I hope you
> will be able to share the result once the mystery is solved.
>
>      With best wishes,
>
>           Gerard.
>
> --
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 03:32:30PM +0100, Misba Ahmad wrote:
> > Dear Gerard,
> > The data were collected at 0.966Å and I can see the anomalous peaks for
> As
> > at Cysteines which are modified and I have correctly modelled those (see
> > image below). However, at this Tyr, I don't see an anomalous signal.
> >
> > [image: 4.png]
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 3:06 PM Gerard Bricogne <g...@globalphasing.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Dear Misba,
> > >
> > >      A wild guess: have you considered the possibility that this extra
> > > density could be a cacodylate adduct? Cacodylate is well known to react
> > > with
> > > thiols - see
> > >
> > >
> > >
> https://febs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1016/0014-5793(72)80224-2
> > >
> > > Here the chemistry is different but you never know. If your data are
> > > redundant enough that you have good anomalous completeness, and were
> > > collected above the As K-edge (11.8667 keV), it might be a good idea to
> > > compute an anomalous difference Fourier and check for the presence of a
> > > peak
> > > at the same location as the highest one in your ordinary difference
> map.
> > >
> > >      Only a wild guess, though ... .
> > >
> > >
> > >      With best wishes,
> > >
> > >           Gerard.
> > >
> > > --
> > > On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 12:18:58PM +0100, Misba Ahmad wrote:
> > > > Placing a water molecule satisfies most of the density and forms nice
> > > > H-bonds but there is still some residual density left (8.6 and 5.6
> rmsd).
> > > >
> > > > Best
> > > > Misbha
> > > > [image: 3.png]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 11:05 AM Klaus Futterer <
> k.futte...@bham.ac.uk>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Looks more like water molecules. Phosphorylation would give a much
> > > bigger
> > > > > peak, and shape of density does not fit either. I don't think this
> is a
> > > > > covalent modification. Model some water molecules and see what the
> > > > > distances are and what difference density is left.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Klaus
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > =======================================================
> > > > > Klaus Fütterer, PhD
> > > > > Reader in Structural Biology
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > School of Biosciences
> > > > > LES College                                            Email:
> > > > > k.futte...@bham.ac.uk
> > > > > University of Birmingham                         Phone: +44 - 121
> - 414
> > > > > 5895
> > > > > Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK                        (voice mail messages
> > > > > will forward to my email inbox)
> > > > >
> > > > > My normal working hours are Mon - Fri 8.30 - 5.30 pm.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > =======================================================
> > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > *From:* CCP4 bulletin board <CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK> on behalf of
> > > > > misba.ah...@gmail.com <misba.ah...@gmail.com>
> > > > > *Sent:* 29 January 2022 09:45:24
> > > > > *To:* CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> > > > > *Subject:* Re: [ccp4bb] Help with interpreting Tyrosine
> modification
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Tom,
> > > > > The protein was expressed in E Coli.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best
> > > > > Misbha
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, 29 Jan 2022, 10:18 Peat, Tom (Manufacturing, Clayton) <
> > > > > tom.p...@csiro.au> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hello Misba,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Doesn't quite look like a phosphate, maybe O-sulfation?
> > > > >> Maybe just as important as the buffer and crystallisation
> conditions
> > > > >> would be how it was expressed? Insect cells?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Best of luck, tom
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Tom Peat, PhD
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Biomedical Program, CSIRO
> > > > >> tom.p...@csiro.au
> > > > >>
> > > > >> ------------------------------
> > > > >> *From:* CCP4 bulletin board <CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK> on behalf of
> > > Misba
> > > > >> Ahmad <misba.ah...@gmail.com>
> > > > >> *Sent:* Saturday, January 29, 2022 8:12 PM
> > > > >> *To:* CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK <CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
> > > > >> *Subject:* [ccp4bb] Help with interpreting Tyrosine modification
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Hi all,
> > > > >> I am trying to interpret this strong difference density peak
> (11.33
> > > rmsd)
> > > > >> that shows up on the tyrosine residue. Any help would be greatly
> > > > >> appreciated.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Purification buffer: 20mM HEPES pH 7.5, 250mM NaCl, 1mM TCEP, 5mM
> DTT
> > > > >> Crystallisation condition: Sodium propionate, Sodium cacodylate,
> > > BIS-TRIS
> > > > >> propane, PEG 1500
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Best
> > > > >> Misbha
> > > > >> [image: Picture1.png]
> > > > >> [image: Picture2.png]
> > > > >>
> > > > >> ------------------------------
> > > > >>
> > > > >> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> > > > >> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> > > > > https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> ########################################################################
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> > > > https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
> > > >
> > > > This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a
> > > mailing list hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are
> > > available at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/
> > >
>
> ########################################################################
>
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
>
> This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a
> mailing list hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are
> available at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/
>

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/

Reply via email to