Dear Zhijie,

In generally I like the treatment of carbohydrates now as branched polymers. I 
didn't realise there was an exception. It makes sense for unlinked carbohydrate 
ligands, but not for N- or O-glycosylation sites as these might change during 
model building or, in my case, carbohydrate rebuilding in PDB-REDO powered by 
Coot. Thanks for pointing this out.

Cheers,
Robbie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: CCP4 bulletin board <CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK> On Behalf Of Zhijie Li
> Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2020 19:52
> To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Coming July 29: Improved Carbohydrate Data at the
> PDB -- N-glycans are now separate chains if more than one residue
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I was confused when I saw mysterious new glycan chains emerging during
> PDB deposition and spent quite some time trying to find out what was
> wrong with my coordinates.  Then it occurred to me that a lot of recent
> structures also had tens of N-glycan chains.  Finally I realized that this
> phenomenon is a consequence of this PDB policy announced here in July.
> 
> 
> For future depositors who might also get puzzled, let's put it in a short
> sentence:  O- and N-glycans are now separate chains if it they contain more
> than one residue; single residues remain with the protein chain.
> 
> 
> https://www.wwpdb.org/documentation/carbohydrate-remediation
> 
> "Oligosaccharide molecules are classified as a new entity type, branched,
> assigned a unique chain ID (_atom_site.auth_asym_id) and a new mmCIF
> category introduced to define the type of branching
> (_pdbx_entity_branch.type) . "
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I found the differential treatment of single-residue glycans and multi-residue
> glycans not only bit lack of aesthetics but also misleading.  When a structure
> contains both NAG-NAG... and single NAG on N-glycosylation sites, it might
> be because of lack of density for building more residues, or because that
> some of the glycosylation sites are now indeed single NAGs (endoH etc.)
> while some others are not cleaved due to accessibility issues.    Leaving NAGs
> on the protein chain while assigning NAG-NAG... to a new chain, feels like
> suggesting something about their true oligomeric state.
> 
> 
> For example, for cryoEM structures, when one only builds a single NAG at a
> site does not necessarily mean that the protein was treated by endoH. In
> fact all sites are extended to at least tri-Man in most cases. Then why
> keeping some sites associated with the protein chain while others kicked
> out?
> 
> Zhijie
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: CCP4 bulletin board <CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK> on behalf of John
> Berrisford <j...@ebi.ac.uk>
> Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2020 4:39 AM
> To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK <CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
> Subject: [ccp4bb] Coming July 29: Improved Carbohydrate Data at the PDB
> 
> 
> Dear CCP4BB
> 
> PDB data will shortly incorporate a new data representation for
> carbohydrates in PDB entries and reference data that improves the
> Findability and Interoperability of these molecules in macromolecular
> structures. In order to remediate and improve the representation of
> carbohydrates across the archive, the wwPDB has:
> 
> *     standardized Chemical Component Dictionary nomenclature
> following IUPAC-IUBMB recommendations
> *     provided uniform representation for oligosaccharides
> *     adopted Glycoscience-community commonly used linear descriptors
> using community tools
> *     annotated glycosylation sites in PDB structures
> 
> Starting July 29, 2020, users will be able to access the improved data via FTP
> or wwPDB partner websites. Detailed information about this project is
> available at the wwPDB website
> <https://www.wwpdb.org/documentation/carbohydrate-remediation> ; lists
> of impacted entries and chemical components will be published on this page
> after data release.
> 
> The wwPDB has created a new ‘branched’ entity representation for
> polysaccharides, describing all the individual monosaccharide components of
> these in the PDB entry. As part of this process, we have standardized atom
> nomenclature of >1,000 monosaccharides in the Chemical Component
> Dictionary (CCD) and applied a branched entity representation to
> oligosaccharides for >8000 PDB entries. To guarantee unambiguous chemical
> description of oligosaccharides in the affected PDB entries, an explicit
> description of covalent linkage information between their monosaccharide
> units is included. In addition, wwPDB validation reports provide consistent
> representation for these oligosaccharides and include 2D representations
> based on the Symbol Nomenclature for Glycans (SNFG).
> 
> To support the remediation of carbohydrate representation, software tools
> providing linear descriptors were developed in collaboration with the
> glycoscience community to enable easy translation of PDB data to other
> representations commonly used by glycobiologists. These include Condense
> IUPAC from GMML <https://github.com/GLYCAM-Web/gmml>  at University
> of Georgia, WURCS <https://gitlab.com/glyconavi/pdb2glycan>  from
> PDB2Glycan at The Noguchi Institute, Japan, and LINUCS
> <http://www.glycosciences.de/tools/pdb2linucs/>  from pdb-care at
> Germany.
> 
> Furthermore, to ensure continued Findability of 118 common
> oligosaccharides (e.g., sucrose, Lewis Y antigen), we have expanded the
> Biologically Interesting molecule Reference Dictionary (BIRD
> <https://www.wwpdb.org/data/bird> ) that contains the covalent linkage
> information and common synonyms for such molecules.
> 
> wwPDB has also used this opportunity to improve the organization of
> chemical synonyms in the CCD by introducing a new
> _pdbx_chem_comp_synonyms data category. This will enable more
> comprehensive capture of alternative names for small molecules in the PDB.
> To minimize disruption to users, the legacy data item,
> _chem_comp.pdbx_synonyms, will be retained for a transition period
> through 2021.
> 
> The carbohydrate remediation project is a wwPDB collaborative project that
> is carried out principally by RCSB PDB <https://www.rcsb.org/>  at Rutgers,
> The State University of New Jersey and is funded by NIGMS grant U01
> CA221216 in collaboration with Complex Carbohydrate Research Center
> <https://www.ccrc.uga.edu/>  at the University of Georgia.
> 
> If you have any comments or queries regarding the changes to carbohydrate
> representation, please visit the wwPDB website
> <https://www.wwpdb.org/documentation/carbohydrate-remediation>  or
> contact us at deposit-h...@mail.wwpdb.org <mailto:deposit-
> h...@mail.wwpdb.org> .
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Regards
> 
> 
> 
> John
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> John Berrisford
> 
> PDBe
> 
> European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI)
> 
> European Molecular Biology Laboratory
> 
> Wellcome Trust Genome Campus
> 
> Hinxton
> 
> Cambridge CB10 1SD UK
> 
> Tel: +44 1223 492529
> 
> 
> 
> http://www.pdbe.org <http://www.pdbe.org/>
> 
> http://www.facebook.com/proteindatabank
> <http://www.facebook.com/proteindatabank>
> 
> http://twitter.com/PDBeurope <http://twitter.com/PDBeurope>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1


########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/

Reply via email to