Dear Christian,

You obviously mean a _non-crystallographic_ trimer -- in a crystallographic 
trimer the protomers (and their ligands) would be identical by definition.
On the other hand, chains related by non-crystallographic symmetry necessarily 
differ in their environments. As a results of nearby lattice contacts, the 
properties (average conformation, dynamics, electrostatics etc.) of the binding 
sites may have become unfavourable for ligand association in two out of three 
chains in your case. This does not by itself question the relevance of the 
binding site (provided there is good biochemical evidence), but it does 
indicate that the ligand is exchanged with the solvent at a rate that is 
sufficient to allow for such lattice effects. In the end, any conclusion from 
the crystalline state with respect to the solution state should be thought of 
as an extrapolation ;-)

Best regards
Oliver

==================================================
  PD Dr. Oliver H. Weiergräber
  Institut für Biologische Informationsprozesse
  IBI-7: Strukturbiochemie
  Tel.: +49 2461 61-2028
  Fax: +49 2461 61-9540
==================================================




________________________________________
From: CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] on behalf of Christian 
GALICIA [christian.galicia.diaz.sant...@vub.be]
Sent: 27 October 2020 11:19
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] ligand bound to only one chain in the crystal

Hello,
In our structure only one chain in a crystallographic trimer (non-biological) 
shows a ligand bound to it (with clear density). There doesn't seem to be any 
channels (or lack of them) favoring that specific site. Can the community give 
your opinion on whether this can make the presence of the ligand or its 
biological role questionable, and give any examples of similar cases you might 
be aware of. Thank you.
--
Christian Galicia
Post Doctoral Scientist
E-mail: cgali...@vub.be<mailto:cgali...@vub.be>



________________________________

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1



------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH
52425 Juelich
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Juelich
Eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Dueren Nr. HR B 3498
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: MinDir Volker Rieke
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Wolfgang Marquardt (Vorsitzender),
Karsten Beneke (stellv. Vorsitzender), Prof. Dr.-Ing. Harald Bolt
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/

Reply via email to