Dear all, Thanks a lot! (I should have used the PDB query myself for neutrons, sry, my bad)
As there was a request to share the bioRxiv links, here they are: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.21.106740v1 https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.22.110189v1 along with the comment in Nature (which also has both links to the papers in the references section): https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-01658-1 So: X-ray at 0.48 A Neutron at 0.93 A (hybrid with X-ray) or 1.05 A Cryo EM 1.25 A electron diffraction 0.6 A Thanks to all of you! Best, Tobias. On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 3:46 PM Tobias Beck <tobiasb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear all, > > Thanks for the link to the latest BioRxiv papers! So for cryo EM it is 1.2 > now. Any numbers for neutron? > > Best, Tobias. > > Tobias Beck <tobiasb...@gmail.com> schrieb am Di. 9. Juni 2020 um 15:35: > >> Dear all, >> >> I was asked by a student what the highest resolution is, for each of the >> four methods listed above. Maybe someone has researched the current numbers >> previously and would like to share them? For X-ray, I found 0.48 A in the >> PDB. For EM method details, the PDB gives me 0.6 A, but it is actually for >> electron diffraction. I found a structure with 1.8 A for Cryo EM. >> >> I am aware that resolution is only one parameter and that high resolution >> may not correspond to high data quality. However, maybe someone knows the >> record holders, either for biomacromolecules or small molecules or for >> both. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Best, Tobias. >> >> >> >> ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1 This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/
