Dear Chris,

The first thing I would do is to load the FFT map (not the mtz) in coot and see 
how densities of both ligands compare in that case. Also in FFT, did you 
calculate exactly one unit cell, or did you select a region just around the 
protein? If you contour the maps in terms of RMSD, the amount of solvent 
included in the maps influences the RMSD level. For comparison it would be 
better to look at contour levels in electrons/Å**3. Finally, you could also 
look at the contour levels of the surrounding protein atoms, to get an idea how 
the ligand density compares to the protein density.

Best,
Herman

Von: CCP4 bulletin board <CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK> Im Auftrag von Chris Fage
Gesendet: Montag, 30. September 2019 12:37
An: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Betreff: [EXTERNAL] [ccp4bb] 2Fo-Fc maps in Coot vs. Pymol


EXTERNAL : Real sender is 
owner-ccp...@jiscmail.ac.uk<mailto:owner-ccp...@jiscmail.ac.uk>

Dear All,

I recently obtained structures of a protein bound to two different small 
molecules. When viewing the structures in Coot with a similar contour setting, 
the 2Fo-Fc map around ligand 1 is clearly much weaker than that around ligand 
2.However, after generating 2Fo-Fc maps in FFT and loading them in Pymol 
(again, choosing equal contour levels), the maps surrounding ligands 1 and 2 
have nearly the same quality. Is there a difference in scaling between the two 
programs that can account for this? Thanks for any advice!

Best wishes,
Chris

[https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-green-avg-v1.png]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.avg.com_email-2Dsignature-3Futm-5Fmedium-3Demail-26utm-5Fsource-3Dlink-26utm-5Fcampaign-3Dsig-2Demail-26utm-5Fcontent-3Dwebmail&d=DwMFaQ&c=Dbf9zoswcQ-CRvvI7VX5j3HvibIuT3ZiarcKl5qtMPo&r=HK-CY_tL8CLLA93vdywyu3qI70R4H8oHzZyRHMQu1AQ&m=JB0q0dL5k3brkVlvZ6JtwS2ZgxG16MYZHEuyyCKXl5I&s=LrW_ht7LQyzaIgiOBBTPFBShwT1cX8B1f7mRfDZRJtg&e=>

Virus-free. 
www.avg.com<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.avg.com_email-2Dsignature-3Futm-5Fmedium-3Demail-26utm-5Fsource-3Dlink-26utm-5Fcampaign-3Dsig-2Demail-26utm-5Fcontent-3Dwebmail&d=DwMFaQ&c=Dbf9zoswcQ-CRvvI7VX5j3HvibIuT3ZiarcKl5qtMPo&r=HK-CY_tL8CLLA93vdywyu3qI70R4H8oHzZyRHMQu1AQ&m=JB0q0dL5k3brkVlvZ6JtwS2ZgxG16MYZHEuyyCKXl5I&s=LrW_ht7LQyzaIgiOBBTPFBShwT1cX8B1f7mRfDZRJtg&e=>


________________________________

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.jiscmail.ac.uk_cgi-2Dbin_webadmin-3FSUBED1-3DCCP4BB-26A-3D1&d=DwMFaQ&c=Dbf9zoswcQ-CRvvI7VX5j3HvibIuT3ZiarcKl5qtMPo&r=HK-CY_tL8CLLA93vdywyu3qI70R4H8oHzZyRHMQu1AQ&m=JB0q0dL5k3brkVlvZ6JtwS2ZgxG16MYZHEuyyCKXl5I&s=_jWAHzSBesMuvzCcRU6p1pxSgs__xBafHFiGWsOZR8Y&e=>

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

Reply via email to