Good advice above..
Someting extra - I would look at information about how the molecules might
be arranged.
Is there any non-crystallographic translation? ( One with a coordinate 0f
say z= 0.5 could mean the spacegroup
could be P21212 or P212121 )

Sometimes there is a sub-cell and you can search for fewer sites in that
cell..
Eleanor



On Thu, 18 Jul 2019 at 16:28, Mario Tyago Murakami <
mario.murak...@lnbr.cnpem.br> wrote:

> Dear Andy, Clemens and Michal
>
> The solution for orthrombic SG is very clear. P1 indexing results in a
> very similar Unit cell parameters without appreciable deviations in angles
> <0.1degrees.
>
> It seems more likely the problem pointed by Andy of a lot of sites. I will
> try all the suggestions and hope to come back soon with good news.
>
> Thanks
> Mario
>
> Em 18 de jul de 2019 11:44, THOMPSON Andrew <
> andrew.thomp...@synchrotron-soleil.fr> escreveu:
>
> Dear Mario
>
> The data seem very good but you are looking for an awful lot of sites.
> Keep trying with SHELX, but there are some keywords that you might use
> which may help (see extract from SHELX doc). This worked for me for a
> couple of structures with > 100 sites. You should also try with and without
> Patterson seeding.  You may need many thousand trials…. I would also start
> with the data cutoff somewhere between 3.5 - 4 A (to get rid of anisotropy)
> . You could also try manually modifying the Emin value to use just your
> strongest signal. Don’t expect the solution to come out easily - you may
> have to try different shelx runs for days before getting a single solution.
>
> At the same time, you really do need to be absolutely certain of the space
> group ……any tests you can do
>
> Good luck
>
> Andy
>
>
>
>
>
> For large selenomethionine substructures (which behave more like equal
> atom ab initiostructure solution of small molecules) it may be worth
> increasing the number of Pattersonpeaks used for the Patterson seeding
> (e.g. PATT 200; the default is 100) and adding theinstructions WEED 0.3
> (random omit maps) and SKIP 0.5 (uranium atom removal). Thelatter two are
> the defaults when PLOP is present but are switched off by default if PLOP
> isabsent. When PATS is used, WEED produces a much smaller additional
> improvement in thehit ratio than when PATS is absent. For small
> substructures (<10 sites), WEED and SKIP cando more harm than good by
> eliminating too many correct sites at once.
>
>
>
> *De :* CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] *De la part de*
> Mario Tyago Murakami
> *Envoyé :* jeudi 18 juillet 2019 16:19
> *À :* CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> *Objet :* [ccp4bb] Se-SAD phasing
>
>
>
> Dear all,
>
> I am trying to solve the phases of the following SeMet data, but so far
> unsuccessfully. Suggestions are very welcome. Please see below some details
> about the case.
>
>
>
> The statistics below is from a merged data from  different kappas of the
> same crystal to increase redundancy. We used the fixed energy 12675 eV
> since the fluorescence detector was not working at the used beamline to get
> best energy values for this crystal.
>
> Xtriage did not indicate any crystallographic pathology, except moderate
> anisotropy.
>
> The unit cells parameters are 118.72   151.82   167.05  90.000  90.000
> 90.000 (P212121) containing from 8 to 12 molecules in the asymmetric unit.
> The protein has ~28.5 kDa and 10 Met residues, excluding those from the N-
> and C-termini, probably with low occupancy. Thus, something 80 to 120
> scatterers are expected.
>
> Phenix_anomalous_signal indicates a probability of 99% to solve it and the
> anomalous signal is theoretically in a very good range.
>
> I have tried SHELXD with different resolutions and number of sites. I have
> also used Hyss. But all attempts failed.
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Mario
>
>
>
> [image: cid:image001.png@01D53D5A.1C2140F0]
>
>
>
> Aviso Legal: Esta mensagem e seus anexos podem conter informações
> confidenciais e/ou de uso restrito. Observe atentamente seu conteúdo e
> considere eventual consulta ao remetente antes de copiá-la, divulgá-la ou
> distribuí-la. Se você recebeu esta mensagem por engano, por favor avise o
> remetente e apague-a imediatamente.
>
> Disclaimer: This email and its attachments may contain confidential and/or
> privileged information. Observe its content carefully and consider possible
> querying to the sender before copying, disclosing or distributing it. If
> you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and
> delete it immediately.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
>

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

Reply via email to