Hi Frank

on the same lines: do we keep our crystals after frying them? Or do molecular 
biologists keep their agarose gels? Hummm... evolution and technologies do 
progress.

Yet, I would support keeping images, just as you may (but really will most 
likely never) want to re-process those with new software approaches etc. few 
years after the paper has been published ^^

Cheers, leo
 
-
Leonard Chavas
- 
Synchrotron SOLEIL
Proxima-I
L'Orme des Merisiers
Saint-Aubin - BP 48
91192 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex
France
- 
Phone:  +33 169 359 746
Mobile: +33 644 321 614
E-mail: leonard.cha...@synchrotron-soleil.fr
-

> On 13 Jul 2018, at 16:36, Frank von Delft <frank.vonde...@sgc.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> Are the LHC researchers that analyse the detector readout on the fly without 
> ever storing the data also guilty of malpractice?  Hardcore.
> 
> Just a few more years, a few more Eiger detectors, a few more serial 
> beamlines, a few more clusters and clouds, and a few more DIALS-style 
> programmers, before MX too throws in the towel and       starts trusting 
> real-time processing and stops bothering with storing "raw" images.  
> phx.
> 
> 
> On 13/07/2018 11:07, John R Helliwell wrote:
>> Dear Sergei,
>> Re “all”. As a researcher my perspective is that one’s funding agency 
>> requirement for a data management plan will be the core of what you would 
>> need to follow. Your employer may have additional policies and requirements 
>> placed on you as an employee. Eg the UK funding agency EPSRC requires data 
>> be retained for 10 years. My employer, University of Manchester, has a 
>> policy which regards data loss as research malpractice. 
>> Central facility data retention policies vary from facility to facility so 
>> you would need to check ie for the ones you use. 
>> For publication IUCr encourages raw data underpinning a publication be 
>> archived and its doi cited. That doi can also be entered into the relevant 
>> PDB deposition. 
>> Best wishes,
>> John
>> 
>> 
>> Emeritus Professor John R Helliwell DSc
>> 
>> On 13 Jul 2018, at 10:30, Sergei Strelkov <sergei.strel...@kuleuven.be> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Dear All,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I believe this question may be of some interest.
>>> In the past, we always stored all raw data ever collected by the lab.
>>> 
>>> With the recent advances, such as
>>> (a) automated/on-the-fly processing offered by some (European) 
>>> synchrotrons, and
>>> 
>>> (b) an ongoing discussion on centralized raw data archiving,
>>> 
>>> I wonder if it is time to revise the strict policy of keeping all data 
>>> (before we invest in a new NAS system... )
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Best wishes,
>>> 
>>> Sergei
>>> 
>>> Prof. Sergei V. Strelkov Laboratory for Biocrystallography Department of 
>>> Pharmaceutical Sciences, KU Leuven 
>>> 
>>> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
>>> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
>>> 
>> 
>> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
>> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
>> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
> 


########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

Reply via email to