Hello, John, the lower-resolution datasets in your paper were generated by > truncating a high-res dataset, i.e. the "lo-res" datasets are of great > quality. Would the conclusions still be valid if the data are "true > low-res"? (i.e. I/sigI 1.5-2 in last shell)? >
genuinely low-res data set is clearly not the same as one obtained by truncation of high-res reflections. Some time ago I did a test where I truncated an ultra-high resolution data set (0.6A resolution) at 2A, and I could still see H atoms in 2A resolution map! Pavel
